It is beyond dispute that bombing a State’s military assets qualifies as a “use of force” against that State, an action prohibited by Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and its customary international law counterpart. Similarly, it is indisputable that militarily taking control of another State’s territory is a use of force. Indeed, both actions are encompassed in the 1974 UN General Assembly’s Resolution 3314(XXIX), Definition of Aggression, which labels aggression “the most serious and dangerous form of the illegal use of force.”
Any of the following acts
Regardless of a declaration of war, shall, subject to and in accordance el salvador phone number library the provisions of article 2, qualify as an act of aggression:
(a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack…
(b) Bombardment by the armed forces of a State against the territory of another State or the use of any weapons by a State enterprise digital marketing for manufacturing companies the territory of another State;
An attack by the armed forces
A State on the land, sea or air forces, or marine and air fleets of another State… (annex, art. 3).
Yet, this begs the question of whether the fall of the Assad regime, which controlled the assets that were book your list and the territory taken, affects the prohibition’s application. Its unanticipated overnight collapse and the disintegration of the armed forces complicate the determination of whether the HTS rebels, alone or with other armed groups, have formed an entity capable of representing Syria in its international relations. Under a traditional approach grounded in effectiveness, the rebels will qualify as the de facto government once they exercise effective control over the instruments of power in Damascus, as well as a majority of the State’s territory and population (1923 Tinoco Arbitration).